From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: vfs2 (was Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:23:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20040827212339.GF709@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20040824202521.GA26705@lst.de> <412CEE38.1080707@namesys.com> <20040825152805.45a1ce64.akpm@osdl.org> <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, torvalds@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Hans Reiser Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <412D9FE6.9050307@namesys.com> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Hi! > >Yes, but I didn't say "flame Christoph and ignore the issues" ;) > > > > > Oh....;-) ... > enhancements. This metafiles and file-directories stuff is actually > fairly trivial stuff. Now I'm scared. not as powerful. Don't > move reiser4 into vfs, use reiser4 as the vfs. Don't write > filesystems, write file plugins and disk format plugins and all the > other kinds of plugins, and you won't be missing any expressive power > that you really want.... So you want to replace vfs. Fine, but you should have told us before. Also vfs replacement probably should not be hidden in fs/reiserfs4... -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms