Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives

Horst von Brand
2004-09-03T17:41:10Z

Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@hist.no> said:

[...]

> The only new thing needed is the ability for something to be both
> file and directory at the same time.

Then why have files and directories in the first place?

> Some tools will need
> a update - usually only because they blindly assume that a directory
> isn't a file too, or that a file can't be a directory too. Remove the
> mistaken assumption and things will work because the underlying system
> calls (chdir or open) _will_ work.

But with some weird restrictions: No moving stuff around between files, no
linking, some "files" can't be deleted (how would you handle removing the
principal stream of a file?). Some stuff you'd love to do (is, in fact, the
reason for this all) just can't be allowed (i.e., J. Random Luser setting
his own icon for system-wide emacs). So the tools/scripts/users/sysadmins
will have to be painfully aware that some of the files aren't, and some of
the directories aren't either. Major pain in the neck to use, if you look
closer. Add extra kernel complexity. For little (if any) gain.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513