Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives

Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
2004-09-06T12:55:57Z

On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 11:15:59 +0200, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando
<gorlando@futuretg.com> wrote:
> Tonnerre wrote:
> >Because KDE people hate Gnome people and vice versa, and because the
> >rest of the world just neglects the two races for political reasons.
> This is completely wrong. Neither KDE people hate GNOME people
> nor viceversa.
>
> Time ago, I repeat in a conference the GNOME people need to jump
> on the KDE wagon, so the train will move to a single direction, and
> people does not approve this comment.
>
> More than on the license, QPL, there are a developer problem.

KDE is covered with LGPL/GPL licence, so is QT, so I don't see a problem here.

> Develop in C (Gtk, GNOME) is a lot more easy than develop in C++
> (Qt, KDE)
Well, some ppl knowing well C++ will say something completly different.
Since I've started QT/KDE development, my life as developer has changed.
I am developing everything in QT, as far as desktop stuff goes. And
it's much more clear and easier.
You just need to lear C++ well ;)

> But, for the GUI, the C++ approach is a lot superior ... a lot.
>
> The problem is this. They start to develop on Gtk to create GNOME, in C
> for a license problem.
> I don't agree FreeDesktop.org, because it is handled by a RedHat employee
> and the code is made on Gtk2, generally.
>
> ... They are not neutral.
Agreed.

--
GJ