From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:09:04 +0200 Message-ID: <200409021309.04780.oliver@neukum.org> References: <20040826150202.GE5733@mail.shareable.org> <4136E0B6.4000705@namesys.com> <1117111836.20040902115249@tnonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Hans Reiser , Linus Torvalds , David Masover , Jamie Lokier , Horst von Brand , Adrian Bunk , , Christoph Hellwig , , , Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , ReiserFS List Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Spam In-Reply-To: <1117111836.20040902115249@tnonline.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2004 11:52 schrieb Spam: > =A0 Btw, version control for ordinary files would be a great feature. I > =A0 think something like it is available through Windows 2000/3 server. > =A0 Isn't it called "Shadow Copies". It works over network shares. :) >=20 > =A0 It allows you to restore previous versions of the file even if you > =A0 delete or overwrite it. There's no need to do that in kernel, unless you want to be able to force it unto users. Regards Oliver