From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was: silent semantic changes with reiser4)
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 00:04:44 +0200
Message-ID: <20040902220444.GA23645@lst.de>
References: <200408282314.i7SNErYv003270@localhost.localdomain> <20040901200806.GC31934@mail.shareable.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409011311150.2295@ppc970.osdl.org> <1094118362.4847.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040902203854.GA4801@janus> <1094160994.31499.19.camel@shaggy.austin.ibm.com> <20040902214806.GA5272@janus> <20040902220027.GD23987@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20040902220242.GA5414@janus> <20040902220354.GA23618@lst.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-21341-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@xs4all.nl>,
   viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
   Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
   Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
   Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
   Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
   Alexander Lyamin aka FLX <flx@namesys.com>,
   ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040902220354.GA23618@lst.de>
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:03:54AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:02:42AM +0200, Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 11:00:27PM +0100, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> > > 
> > > The hell it is.
> > > 
> > > a) kernel has *NO* *FUCKING* *KNOWLEDGE* of fs type contained on a device.
> > 
> > excuse me, but how does the kernel mount the root fs?
> 
> trial and error.  That's why you see all thos ext3 mounted as ext2
> problems, or $RANDOMFS as fat.

Andb btw, for an lkml discussion RTFS wouldn't hurt.