From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:30:58 +0200 Message-ID: <200409031030.58319.oliver@neukum.org> References: <20040826150202.GE5733@mail.shareable.org> <4137BE36.5020504@slaphack.com> <20040903091352.A2288@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Masover , Spam , Hans Reiser , Linus Torvalds , Jamie Lokier , Horst von Brand , Adrian Bunk , viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , ReiserFS List Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: <20040903091352.A2288@infradead.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 3. September 2004 10:13 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 07:43:34PM -0500, David Masover wrote: > > | There's no need to do that in kernel, unless you want to be able > > | to force it unto users. > > > > And on apps. Should I teach OpenOffice.org to do version control? > > Seems a lot easier to just do it in the kernel, and teach everything to > > do version control in one fell swoop. > > Just add a post-save trigger that can check it into any SCM you want. That depends on whom you refer to. If you want to impose the RCS on the users as an administrative measure and force compliance, then you'll need to do it in kernel. I see some nasty issues with disk quotas there. Regards Oliver