From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:44:22 +0200 Message-ID: <200409071544.22439.oliver@neukum.org> References: <200409070206.i8726vrG006493@localhost.localdomain> <20040907123011.GA18828@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Christer Weinigel , David Masover , Horst von Brand , Spam , Tonnerre , Linus Torvalds , Pavel Machek , Jamie Lokier , Chris Wedgwood , viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Christoph Hellwig , Hans Reiser , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , ReiserFS List Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: Herbert Poetzl In-Reply-To: <20040907123011.GA18828@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, 7. September 2004 14:30 schrieb Herbert Poetzl: > > 1. Do we want support for named streams? > >=20 > > =A0 =A0I belive the answer is yes, since both NTFS and HFS (that's the > > =A0 =A0MacOS filesystem, isn't it?) supports streams we want Linux to > > =A0 =A0support this if possible. >=20 > well, yes HFS has this, is it advantageous, no > it's kind of heritage ... HFS doesn't support _named_ streams. There are just two forks per file. Regards Oliver