From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wayne Scott Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:50:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20040910.105040.30177815.wscott@bitmover.com> References: <1094797973.4838.4.camel@almond.st-and.ac.uk> <4141504B.8030104@namesys.com> <4141CCA2.9010005@techsource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: reiser@namesys.com, Peter.Foldiak@st-andrews.ac.uk, jamie@shareable.org, bunk@fs.tum.de, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, torvalds@osdl.org, hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com To: miller@techsource.com In-Reply-To: <4141CCA2.9010005@techsource.com> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org From: Timothy Miller > Everyone likes ':', so we'd have "problem/shoe:size". (Don't bother to > complain about files which have : in them, because I already know it > sucks, but it's an example.) [[ I just joined this discussion, so pardon if this is already known.]] One advantage of ':' is that portable programs already have to avoid it because of NTFS alternate data streams: http://www.diamondcs.com.au/index.php?page=archive&id=ntfs-streams For example on an XP box with NTFS: $ mkdir j $ cd j $ echo hi > foo:bar $ ls -l total 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 wscott Administ 0 Sep 10 10:45 foo $ cat foo $ cat foo:bar hi $ rm foo $ cat foo:bar cat: foo:bar: No such file or directory -Wayne