From: "William A.(Andy) Adamson" <andros@citi.umich.edu>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"William A.(Andy) Adamson" <andros@citi.umich.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, andros@citi.umich.edu
Subject: Re: file leases
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:16:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040921121629.319331BBAB@citi.umich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:40:08 BST." <20040921084008.GG28786@mail.shareable.org>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > When I share a directory using Samba 3.0.6, sometimes local access to
> > > > a file stalls for a while - on the order of 10 seconds to open a file.
> > >
> > > if your open() is blocking (did not specify O_NONBLOCK) then
> > > break_lease will contact all other processes (samba clients) one
> > > at a time, and will not return until all have been contacted. this
> > > could take a while.
> >
> > And, of course, the samba servers may have to contact their clients and
> > get them to release their oplocks ...
>
> Quite, but the client is a Windows 2000 box completely idle with
> nothing holding the file open, and a good LAN connection.
>
> If an idle client won't release oplocks quickly on request, then
> there's a problem.
it's not a bug, it's a feature! the open from the idle windows box is stalled
at the server while the server sends break_lease messages to all the other
clients with op locks on the file. that is the promise of op locks.
> Surely people using lots of Windows clients don't
> have to wait 10 seconds or more to open a file which somebody else had
> open recently on a different box? I suspect a Samba problem but
> anyways the answer is to disable oplocks. It _could_ be a fault in
> leases, which is why I asked if they're known to be working.
>
> -- Jamie
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-21 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 20:21 PATCH [0/10] lease interfaces for version 4 NFSD William A.(Andy) Adamson
2004-09-20 20:27 ` file leases Jamie Lokier
2004-09-20 20:34 ` William A.(Andy) Adamson
2004-09-21 3:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2004-09-21 8:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-09-21 12:16 ` William A.(Andy) Adamson [this message]
2004-09-21 12:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-09-21 20:30 ` Jeremy Allison
2004-09-22 11:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-09-22 12:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2004-09-22 13:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-09-22 18:59 ` Jeremy Allison
2004-09-22 21:43 ` Jamie Lokier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-21 15:07 William A.(Andy) Adamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040921121629.319331BBAB@citi.umich.edu \
--to=andros@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).