linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor ext3 speedup
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:03:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050116010331.3d9c30ec.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050115170441.GR30982@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>

Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:15:06PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>  >   Attached patch removes unnecessary division and modulo from ext3 code
>  > paths. It reduces (according to oprofile) the CPU usage measurably under
>  > a dbench load (see description of the patch for the numbers).
> 
>  I thought I'd apply Jan & Andreas's patch to ext2 too.  While doing so,
>  I noticed several places where patches had been applied to ext2 and not to
>  ext3.  One of them was even a bugfix.  This patch brings ext2/balloc.c
>  and ext3/balloc.c closer together and fixes the bug.  It includes the
>  aforementioned patch for both ext2 and ext3.
> 
>  For the curious, the bug occurs when ext3_free_blocks_sb() decides to
>  "do_more".  *pdquot_freed_blocks was updated each time around the loop,
>  so bg_free_blocks_count was getting over-incremented.  I fixed it the
>  same way it had been fixed in ext2 -- by introducing a group_freed
>  variable that is reset each time around the loop.

The patch does boatloads of other things too.

Matthew.  You know the routine ;)

      reply	other threads:[~2005-01-16  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-13 12:15 [PATCH] Minor ext3 speedup Jan Kara
2005-01-15 17:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-01-16  9:03   ` Andrew Morton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050116010331.3d9c30ec.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).