From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: ext3 writepages ? Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:33:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20050208013351.GE2635@schnapps.adilger.int> References: <1107358324.3503.424.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050202201953.GA2728@kevlar.burdell.org> <1107445897.3503.465.camel@dyn318077bld.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050203205011.GA30671@kevlar.burdell.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h" Cc: Badari Pulavarty , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Received: from H190.C26.B96.tor.eicat.ca ([66.96.26.190]:36803 "EHLO moraine.clusterfs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261380AbVBHBd6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:33:58 -0500 To: Sonny Rao Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050203205011.GA30671@kevlar.burdell.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Feb 03, 2005 15:50 -0500, Sonny Rao wrote: > Well, from what I can tell, my patch doesn't seem to make much of a > difference in write throughput other than allowing multi-page bios to > be sent down and cutting down on buffer_head usage. Even if it doesn't make a difference in performance, it might reduce the CPU usage. Did you check that at all? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://members.shaw.ca/adilger/ http://members.shaw.ca/golinux/ --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCCBb/pIg59Q01vtYRAivnAKDlosNs1HtOEIL7YUjkYL303yqK9wCePBL4 +w9/9i2vMrJzgXp4pYgajhc= =hxYK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xJK8B5Wah2CMJs8h--