From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: fishy ->put_inode usage in ntfs
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:50:03 +0100
Message-ID: <20050210145003.GA7399@lst.de>
References: <20041014112607.GA24508@lst.de> <1097757569.21275.40.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20041014125933.GA26021@lst.de> <1097760404.21275.52.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20050210104719.GA2771@lst.de> <1108046439.12000.9.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20050210144254.GA7222@lst.de> <1108046906.12000.16.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: ntfs-dev <linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:34519 "EHLO mail.lst.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262122AbVBJOuM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:50:12 -0500
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1108046906.12000.16.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:48:26PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> If the igrab() were not done, it would be possible for clear_inode to be
> called on the 'parent' inode whilst at the same time one or more attr
> inodes (belonging to this 'parent') are in use and Bad Things(TM) would
> happen...

What bad thing specificly?  If there's shared information we should
probably refcount them separately.