From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: NFS4 mount problem Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:55:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20050417135521.GA6876@infradead.org> References: <20050415222122.61b4a9e9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20050415132259.24c3d570.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bryan Henderson , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org, steved@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:27585 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261317AbVDQN4J (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:56:09 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050415132259.24c3d570.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:22:59PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > Make a ->compat_read_super() just like we have a ->compat_ioctl() > method for files, if you want to suggest a solution like what > you describe. I don't think we should encourage filesystem writers to do such stupid things as ncfps/smbfs do. In fact I'm totally unhappy thay nfs4 went down that road.