From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Galibert Subject: Re: [PATCH] private mounts Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:48:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20050425094804.GA33040@dspnet.fr.eu.org> References: <20050424201820.GA28428@infradead.org> <20050424205422.GK13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050424210616.GM13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050424211942.GN13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from dspnet.fr.eu.org ([213.186.44.138]:48402 "EHLO dspnet.fr.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262563AbVDYJsJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2005 05:48:09 -0400 To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050424211942.GN13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:19:42PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > Of course you can. It does execute the obvious set of rc files. Is there a possibility for a process to change its namespace to another existing one? That would be needed to have a per-user namespace you go to from rc files or pam. I'd kinda wonder what happens to pwd. OG.