From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: filesystem transactions API Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:19:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20050426151916.GA14297@mail.shareable.org> References: <20050424211942.GN13052@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050426134629.GU16169@viasys.com> <20050426141426.GC10833@mail.shareable.org> <426E4EBD.6070104@oktetlabs.ru> <20050426143247.GF10833@mail.shareable.org> <426E5428.2090306@oktetlabs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ville Herva , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:10921 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261568AbVDZPTW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:19:22 -0400 To: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426E5428.2090306@oktetlabs.ru> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > Hmm, so the whole point to implement transactions in the kernel space is > to do the transactions in a way that nobody can see any intermediate > inconsistent state ? Yes. -- Jamie