From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Ram <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:05:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050511090504.GD24841@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050430150111.GB4362@mail.shareable.org>
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:01:11PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > > The question is whether private user-mounts should, by default, behave
> > > more like environment variables or more like files.
> >
> > I think you're a little confused.
>
> No, I'm not.
>
> Here's a perhaps more illustrative example. My bookmarks in
> ~/.ncftp/bookmarks are not per session, they're per user.
They're first a global resource - the file exist everywhere. The only
think that makes it per-user is how ncftp interprets them. By looking
into looking into /tmp/$SID/ncftp/bookmarks it could be made per-session.
(although that'd be totally useless of course)
> Rephrasing the question: The question is whether private user-mounts
> should, by default, behave more like environment variables or more
> like bookmarks.
>
> It's a user interface question, not a technical question. Understand?
It's very much a technical/philosophical question. The user interface
isn't a thing that just happens out of thin air, there must be an
implementation behind it.
And in UNIX our traditional model for this kinds of things is to be per-
session, initialized by per-user values. At this point we have an user
interface, and it's a well-understood one that works very well for similar
things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-11 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-19 22:13 [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-04-19 22:23 ` Al Viro
2005-04-19 23:53 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-04-20 3:33 ` Al Viro
2005-04-20 9:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-20 10:27 ` Al Viro
2005-04-20 12:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-20 12:39 ` Al Viro
2005-04-20 16:51 ` Ram
2005-04-20 17:09 ` Al Viro
2005-04-20 17:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
[not found] ` <a4e6962a0504201107518416e9@mail.gmail.com>
2005-04-20 18:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-04-20 18:34 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-04-20 20:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-20 20:54 ` Al Viro
2005-04-20 22:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-20 21:08 ` Al Viro
2005-04-20 22:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-20 18:00 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-04-20 18:33 ` Ram
2005-04-20 22:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-30 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-04-30 15:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-05-11 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2005-04-21 7:33 ` Mount bind filehandle (Was: Re: [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call) Jan Hudec
2005-04-21 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-04-21 9:32 ` Jan Hudec
2005-04-20 18:57 ` [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call Bryan Henderson
2005-04-20 19:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-04-21 0:08 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-04-21 8:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
2005-04-21 13:33 ` [RFC][patch] mount permissions (was: [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow ...) Miklos Szeredi
2005-04-21 16:57 ` [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call Bryan Henderson
2005-04-20 20:51 ` Al Viro
2005-04-21 0:23 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-04-21 0:32 ` Al Viro
2005-04-21 8:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-04-20 21:09 ` Ram
2005-04-21 0:42 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-04-21 19:10 ` Ram
2005-04-20 18:25 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-04-20 12:48 ` Jan Hudec
2005-04-20 22:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-21 10:09 ` Jan Hudec
2005-04-21 18:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-21 18:52 ` Hiding secrets from root (Was: Re: [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call) Jan Hudec
2005-04-21 20:35 ` Jamie Lokier
2005-04-20 13:14 ` [RFC][2.6 patch] Allow creation of new namespaces during mount system call Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-04-20 13:55 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050511090504.GD24841@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).