From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RCF] [PATCH] unprivileged mount/umount
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 10:34:54 +0100
Message-ID: <20050516093454.GB20696@infradead.org>
References: <E1DSyQx-0002ku-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu> <20050511084818.GA24495@infradead.org> <E1DVoK2-0001bS-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ericvh@gmail.com,
	smfrench@austin.rr.com
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:57767 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261503AbVEPJez (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 16 May 2005 05:34:55 -0400
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1DVoK2-0001bS-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Currently we do allow bind mounts over every type of file for the super
> > user.  I think we should keep allowing that.
> 
> Yep.  I didn't change that check (first two lines of function), so it
> should work as it used to.

You're right, I misread the patch.