From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] namespace.c: fix mnt_namespace clearing
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 02:36:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050517013655.GD32226@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DXlgJ-0005iU-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This patch clears mnt_namespace on unmount.
>
> Not clearing mnt_namespace has two effects:
>
> 1) It is possible to attach a new mount to a detached mount,
> because check_mnt() returns true.
>
> This means, that when no other references to the detached mount
> remain, it still can't be freed. This causes a resource leak,
> and possibly un-removable modules.
>
> 2) If mnt_namespace is dereferenced (only in mark_mounts_for_expiry())
> after the namspace has been freed, it can cause an Oops, memory
> corruption, etc.
>
> 1) has been tested before and after the patch, 2) is only speculation.
You're right - I was just thinking the same thing. There is also
another side effect, which is ironic in the context of recent discussion:
3) Because mnt_namespace may refer to freed memory, it may refer
to memory that's then allocated for _another_ namespace. So the
check for mounting in the correct namespace which prevents
recursive bind mounts could erronously _allow_ the recursive
bind to succeed (though without taking the correct lock).
-- Jamie
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-17 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-16 19:55 [PATCH] namespace.c: fix mnt_namespace clearing Miklos Szeredi
2005-05-17 1:36 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050517013655.GD32226@mail.shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).