From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
Cc: mark.fasheh@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, wim.coekaerts@oracle.com,
lmb@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] OCFS2
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:05:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050623200524.298a6ab4.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0506231358230.14123-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com>
James wrote:
> Any chance of splitting it out?
Responding to your post, but I guess it's really Oracle I'm asking:
On my first glance just now at the git-ocfs patch, I was surprised that
what seemed to be separable facilities were combined into one patch. I
see a file system, a lock manager (is that what DLM stands for - please
spell out acronyms) and a configuration file system.
+configfs/
+ - directory containing configfs documentation and example code.
...
+dlmfs.txt
+ - info on the userspace interface to the OCFS2 DLM.
...
+ocfs2.txt
+ - info and mount options for the OCFS2 clustered filesystem.
These combine to make a 45 thousand line patch. That's a big patch.
Only the netdev and reiser4 patches (and the combined linus.patch)
are bigger.
Shouldn't these be 3 patches, or more?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-24 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-18 22:33 [RFC] [PATCH] OCFS2 Mark Fasheh
2005-05-18 23:35 ` Hans Reiser
2005-05-18 23:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 1:26 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Manish Singh
2005-05-19 9:45 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-05-19 2:30 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-05-19 4:30 ` Mark Fasheh
2005-05-19 6:30 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-05-19 6:54 ` Mark Fasheh
2005-05-19 16:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-05-19 10:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-19 15:20 ` Lee Revell
2005-05-19 15:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-06-23 18:03 ` James Morris
2005-06-23 18:29 ` Mark Fasheh
2005-06-24 3:05 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-06-24 3:29 ` Paul Jackson
2005-06-24 3:59 ` Mark Fasheh
2005-06-24 4:17 ` Paul Jackson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-21 21:14 Steve French
2005-06-21 22:03 ` Mark Fasheh
2005-06-21 22:43 ` Steve French
2005-06-22 0:04 ` Mark Fasheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050623200524.298a6ab4.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).