From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Subject: Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 20:15:02 +0200
Message-ID: <20050708181502.GD1165@wiggy.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507081527040.3743@scrub.home> <OFF7ECFC50.4EDB3D93-ON88257038.0059F048-88257038.005AEAF4@us.ibm.com> <20050708180302.GC1165@wiggy.net> <42CEC17D.8020309@waychison.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@us.ibm.com>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, bfields@fieldses.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel=40m.gmane.org-S262758AbVGHSPy@vger.kernel.org>
To: Mike Waychison <mike@waychison.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42CEC17D.8020309@waychison.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Previously Mike Waychison wrote:
> enums in C are (de?)promoted to integral types under most conditions, so 
> the type-checking is useless.

It's a warning in gcc afaik and spare should complain as well.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.