From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wim Coekaerts Subject: Re: Re: GFS, what's remaining Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 23:46:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20050903064633.GB4593@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> References: <20050901104620.GA22482@redhat.com> <20050903001628.GH21228@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <200509030242.36506.phillips@istop.com> Reply-To: linux clustering Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: linux clustering Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509030242.36506.phillips@istop.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:42:36AM -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Friday 02 September 2005 20:16, Mark Fasheh wrote: > > As far as userspace dlm apis go, dlmfs already abstracts away a large part > > of the dlm interaction... > > Dumb question, why can't you use sysfs for this instead of rolling your own? because it's totally different. have a look at what it does.