From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
Subject: Re: GFS, what's remaining
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 16:56:02 -0400
Message-ID: <200509031656.03418.phillips@istop.com>
References: <20050901104620.GA22482@redhat.com>
	<1125728040.3223.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
	<20050903103503.GB15239@redhat.com>
Reply-To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-cluster@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Return-path: <linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com>
To: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050903103503.GB15239@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster>,
	<mailto:linux-cluster-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-cluster@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-cluster-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster>,
	<mailto:linux-cluster-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-cluster-bounces@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Saturday 03 September 2005 06:35, David Teigland wrote:
> Just a new version, not a big difference.  The ondisk format changed a
> little making it incompatible with the previous versions.  We'd been
> holding out on the format change for a long time and thought now would be
> a sensible time to finally do it.

What exactly was the format change, and for what purpose?