From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: GFS, what's remaining
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 22:33:44 +0200
Message-ID: <20050904203344.GA1987@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <20050901104620.GA22482@redhat.com> <20050901035939.435768f3.akpm@osdl.org> <1125586158.15768.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050901132104.2d643ccd.akpm@osdl.org> <20050903051841.GA13211@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cluster@redhat.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1751173AbVIDUeE@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050903051841.GA13211@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Hi!

> - read-only mount
> - "specatator" mount (like ro but no journal allocated for the mount,
>   no fencing needed for failed node that was mounted as specatator)

I'd call it "real-read-only", and yes, that's very usefull
mount. Could we get it for ext3, too?
								Pavel
-- 
if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address