From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: Good, recent FS comparison? Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20050921153703.GB19896@mail.shareable.org> References: <6d5bedd8050915131148b8108a@mail.gmail.com> <432A37BF.7060305@dtbb.net> <200509162258.37730.a1426z@gawab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux RAID Mailing List , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Return-path: Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:14291 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751088AbVIUPhR (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:37:17 -0400 To: Al Boldi Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509162258.37730.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Al Boldi wrote: > ext3 is rock-solid! If only. Recently I had a system come up after a power cycle with a directory where reading any file in that directory gives an I/O error. The disk is fine, and it's using ext3 in ordered mode, with IDE write-caching disabled to be sure. So while ext3 is good, I'm not convinced it's rock solid. -- Jamie