From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Boldi Subject: Re: Good, recent FS comparison? Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:34:42 +0300 Message-ID: <200509220034.42284.a1426z@gawab.com> References: <6d5bedd8050915131148b8108a@mail.gmail.com> <200509162258.37730.a1426z@gawab.com> <20050921153703.GB19896@mail.shareable.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux RAID Mailing List , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Return-path: Received: from [212.76.84.84] ([212.76.84.84]:7429 "EHLO raad.intranet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964976AbVIUVgM (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:36:12 -0400 To: Jamie Lokier In-Reply-To: <20050921153703.GB19896@mail.shareable.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Jamie Lokier wrote: > Al Boldi wrote: > > ext3 is rock-solid! > > If only. Recently I had a system come up after a power cycle with a > directory where reading any file in that directory gives an I/O error. > The disk is fine, and it's using ext3 in ordered mode, with IDE > write-caching disabled to be sure. 2.4 or 2.6? In 2.4 try a reboot and force an fsck before mounting. -- Al