From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] GFS: mount and tuning options Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:30:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20051010213025.GP7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20051010171052.GL22483@redhat.com> <20051010210108.GA13457@kroah.com> <20051010211429.GA25691@redhat.com> <20051010211918.GA13920@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Teigland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Greg KH Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051010211918.GA13920@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:19:18PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > + rv += sprintf(buf + rv, "bsize %u\n", sdp->sd_sb.sb_bsize); > > > > + rv += sprintf(buf + rv, "total %lld\n", sc.sc_total); > > > > + rv += sprintf(buf + rv, "free %lld\n", sc.sc_free); > > > > + rv += sprintf(buf + rv, "dinodes %lld\n", sc.sc_dinodes); > > > > > > No, 1 value per sysfs file please. > > > > I'm aware of that rule and have followed it everywhere else. This is a > > special case where the one statfs produces three results. > > Then why not have 4 different files, for the result of the last "statfs" > command? More to the point, what the hell is that doing in sysfs in the first place?