From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] shared mount handling: bind and rbind
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:31:07 +0000
Message-ID: <20051109143107.GV7992@ftp.linux.org.uk>
References: <E1EZInj-0001Ez-AV@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <E1EZnbA-000190-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1751232AbVKIObM@vger.kernel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1EZnbA-000190-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:54:36AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Shouldn't this check go before copy_tree()?  Not much point in copying
> the tree if we are sure it won't be used.

Incorrect.  Propagation nodes further down the tree can very well be
mountable.