From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Takashi Sato <sho@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stat64 for over 2TB file returned invalid st_blocks
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:39:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051201123953.GA24519@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01e901c5f66e$d4551b70$4168010a@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp>
On Thu, 1 December 2005 21:00:26 +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
>
> I found a problem at stat64 on 32bit architecture.
>
> When I called stat64 for a file which is larger than 2TB, stat64
> returned an invalid number of blocks at st_blocks on 32bit
> architecture, although it returned a valid number of blocks on 64bit
> architecture(ia64).
My take was to simply hold a u64 in the fs-private inode structure and
use ULONG_MAX for inode->i_blocks in case of an overflow. Also has
the nice advantage of working with fs-sized blocks, not 512-byte ones:
inode->i_blocks = ULONG_MAX;
if (li->li_blocks<<3 < ULONG_MAX)
inode->i_blocks = li->li_blocks<<3;
That said, your solution appears to be much better, as long as it
doesnt subtly break binary compatibility.
Jörn
--
ticks = jiffies;
while (ticks == jiffies);
ticks = jiffies;
-- /usr/src/linux/init/main.c
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-01 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-01 12:00 stat64 for over 2TB file returned invalid st_blocks Takashi Sato
2005-12-01 12:39 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2005-12-01 12:52 ` Jörn Engel
2005-12-01 13:52 ` Avi Kivity
2005-12-01 14:32 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-02 13:18 ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-02 14:11 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-02 18:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-12-03 13:00 ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-05 8:11 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-12-05 12:35 ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-05 13:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-01 14:53 ` Al Viro
[not found] <5eVqw-2ug-61@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-12-03 2:19 ` Bodo Eggert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-06 12:42 Takashi Sato
2005-12-06 14:30 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-06 14:48 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-06 14:51 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-06 21:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2005-12-07 0:59 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-07 10:57 ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-07 13:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-07 15:01 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-07 15:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-07 16:34 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-07 18:55 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-08 11:38 ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-08 14:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-08 14:50 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-12-08 15:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-10 11:22 ` Takashi Sato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051201123953.GA24519@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--to=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sho@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).