linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: Takashi Sato <sho@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stat64 for over 2TB file returned invalid st_blocks
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:58:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051202185805.GS14509@schatzie.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <041701c5f742$d6b0a450$4168010a@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp>

On Dec 02, 2005  22:18 +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
> I also found another problem on generic quota code.  In
> dquot_transfer(), the file usage is calculated from i_blocks via
> inode_get_bytes().  If the file is over 2TB, the change of usage is
> less than expected.
> 
> To solve this problem, I think inode.i_blocks should be 8 byte.

Actually, it should probably be "sector_t", because it isn't really
possible to have a file with more blocks than the size of the block
device.  This avoids memory overhead for small systems that have no
need for it in a very highly-used struct.  It may be for some network
filesystems that support gigantic non-sparse files they would need to
enable CONFIG_LBD in order to get support for this.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-02 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-01 12:00 stat64 for over 2TB file returned invalid st_blocks Takashi Sato
2005-12-01 12:39 ` Jörn Engel
2005-12-01 12:52 ` Jörn Engel
2005-12-01 13:52   ` Avi Kivity
2005-12-01 14:32 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-02 13:18   ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-02 14:11     ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-02 18:58     ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2005-12-03 13:00       ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-05  8:11         ` Andreas Dilger
2005-12-05 12:35           ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-05 13:34           ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-01 14:53 ` Al Viro
     [not found] <5eVqw-2ug-61@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-12-03  2:19 ` Bodo Eggert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-06 12:42 Takashi Sato
2005-12-06 14:30 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-06 14:48   ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-06 14:51     ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-06 21:24     ` Andreas Dilger
2005-12-07  0:59       ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-07 10:57       ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-07 13:52         ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-07 15:01           ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-07 15:34             ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-07 16:34               ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-12-07 18:55                 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-08 11:38                 ` Takashi Sato
2005-12-08 14:27                   ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-08 14:50                     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-12-08 15:03                       ` Trond Myklebust
2005-12-10 11:22                     ` Takashi Sato

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051202185805.GS14509@schatzie.adilger.int \
    --to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaggy@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=sho@bsd.tnes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).