linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: "James Northrup" <jim@grrrrr.gotdns.com>
Cc: pml@dtbb.net, a1426z@gawab.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Good, recent FS comparison?
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:45:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051227174552.4d19ab6f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002c01c60b3d$ea98c970$c60c150a@zero>

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:33:18 -0800 James Northrup wrote:

> late reply... but ...
> 
> this is a benchmark I performed for grins sometime about February using two 
> PATA udma5 volumes as software raid0.
> 
> http://kiwi.io-informatics.com/~jnorthrup/filesystem%20benchresults.xls
> 
> 
> the uname -a isn't anywhere to be found but it was circa 2.6.8
> 
> the script is rpesumably still useful, for an experienced data groomer.
> 
> http://kiwi.io-informatics.com/~jnorthrup/fsbench

Do you have a URL that works?


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tyler" <pml@dtbb.net>
> To: "Al Boldi" <a1426z@gawab.com>
> Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; "Linux RAID Mailing List" 
> <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>; <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 1:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Good, recent FS comparison?
> 
> 
> >
> > Al Boldi wrote:
> >
> >>Tyler wrote:
> >>
> >>>Ewan Grantham wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I've just setup a nice, 6-disk, USB-2 300 Gig/disk array, and was
> >>>>prepared to follow my normal pattern of installing ext3 as the
> >>>>filesystem. However, I saw the interview with Hans Reiser about
> >>>>ReiserFS4, and am now wondering if reiser has really improved enough
> >>>>to use it, or if ext3 is still the way to go?
> >>>>
> >>>You'd be best off trying some tests of your own, using files of the size
> >>>and quantity you expect to use on a regular basis.  I would consider
> >>>ext3, xfs, and reiser3/4... and run some tests with them.  We've had
> >>>really good luck using XFS on large raids, I personally had a bad
> >>>experience with reiserfs 3, it lost data on a USB based drive, as if it
> >>>were never even there, even after trying the recovery tools.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Don't touch anything that doesn't do ordered-mode journaling, especially 
> >>if you use raid, unless your data-consistency requirements don't require 
> >>this.
> >>
> >>XFS is best, but does not support ordered-mode.
> >>reiser4 is still new.
> >>ext3 is rock-solid!
> >>
> >>--
> >>Al
> >>
> >>-
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> >>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>
> > Al... you've given us some "do's" .. can you give us some "why's" to go 
> > along with them? :)  I would appreciate a run-down with some more specific 
> > info as to what/why.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tyler.


---
~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-28  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6d5bedd8050915131148b8108a@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <432A37BF.7060305@dtbb.net>
2005-09-16 21:17   ` Good, recent FS comparison? Al Boldi
2005-09-18  9:15     ` Tyler
2005-09-18 11:29       ` Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
2005-09-18 12:32       ` Al Boldi
2005-09-18 16:34       ` Matt Stegman
2005-09-20 21:00         ` George N. White III
2005-12-27 23:33       ` James Northrup
2005-12-28  1:45         ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2005-12-28  2:02           ` James Northrup
2005-09-21 15:37     ` Jamie Lokier
2005-09-21 21:34       ` Al Boldi
2005-09-22 12:14         ` Jamie Lokier
2005-09-22 13:55           ` Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051227174552.4d19ab6f.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
    --cc=jim@grrrrr.gotdns.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=pml@dtbb.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).