linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: mason@suse.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ext2 error reporting on fsync
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:24:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060120132402.51ee5151.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060120134118.GK668@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > (If you're proposing that we walk the buffer_head list until we somehow
> > >  > find the list_head or hlist_head which is embedded within the desired
> > >  > address_space then yes2, but how do we know where to terminate the search?)
> > >    Yes, that's it. If the list is not circular, then it's easy to find
> > >  it's head. So what I suggest is to change private_list from a circular
> > >  list of list_head structures to the non-circular one. And because
> > >  non-circular list is already implemented in hlist macros I'd simply use
> > >  those. The only minor hack is that mapping would not contain hlist_head
> > >  but hlist_node with pprev set to NULL so that we easily recognize it when
> > >  traversing backwards. Is it clearer now?
> > 
> > Ah, yes.  It could get pretty inefficient in some corner cases, I guess.  A
> > 4GB file will have up to 1000 buffers on that list so we're looking at
> > potentially O(1000000) operations.
> > 
> > Plan B is to stick with a doubly-linked list, but mark the address_space's
> > list_head by setting bit 0 of its list_head.next to 1.
> > 
> > The challenge is to implement this in a manner which Linus doesn't notice ;)
>   In the mean time I though of an improvement of our cunning plan ;) We
> could reserve a bit in bh_state. Something like BH_Neighbor_EIO. If
> buffer is going to be thrown out from private_list (and has BH_Write_EIO
> or BH_Neighbor_EIO set) we find another victim (previous buffer on the
> list) and mark it by BH_Neighbor_EIO. If the buffer was the first one,
> we can set error on the mapping. By this we get rid of going through the
> long link list.
>   I guess I like this solution enough so that I start coding ;).

hm.

Another approach would be to allocate a new buffer_head which "belongs" to
the address_space.  So instead of doing:

		bh<->bh<->address_space<->bh<->bh

we do:

                     address_space
                           ^
                           |
                           v
		bh<->bh<->bh'<->bh<->bh

and set a magic bit in bh' which says "this is not a real bh; your
address_space is at *b_private".

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-20 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-11 17:43 [PATCH] Fix ext2 error reporting on fsync Jan Kara
2006-01-12  4:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-12 10:20   ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 11:52     ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-12 13:58       ` Chris Mason
2006-01-12 14:21         ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 15:36           ` Chris Mason
2006-01-12 16:32             ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 14:26       ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 20:47         ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-13  2:08           ` Chris Mason
2006-01-13  2:16             ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-18 22:46               ` Jan Kara
2006-01-18 23:06                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-19 12:21                   ` Jan Kara
2006-01-19 21:16                     ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 13:41                       ` Jan Kara
2006-01-20 21:24                         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-01-20 21:31                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 21:33                             ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-22 22:55                             ` Jan Kara
2006-01-23  0:06                               ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-22 22:32                           ` Jan Kara
2006-01-22 23:31                           ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060120132402.51ee5151.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).