From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: mason@suse.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ext2 error reporting on fsync
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:24:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060120132402.51ee5151.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060120134118.GK668@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > > (If you're proposing that we walk the buffer_head list until we somehow
> > > > find the list_head or hlist_head which is embedded within the desired
> > > > address_space then yes2, but how do we know where to terminate the search?)
> > > Yes, that's it. If the list is not circular, then it's easy to find
> > > it's head. So what I suggest is to change private_list from a circular
> > > list of list_head structures to the non-circular one. And because
> > > non-circular list is already implemented in hlist macros I'd simply use
> > > those. The only minor hack is that mapping would not contain hlist_head
> > > but hlist_node with pprev set to NULL so that we easily recognize it when
> > > traversing backwards. Is it clearer now?
> >
> > Ah, yes. It could get pretty inefficient in some corner cases, I guess. A
> > 4GB file will have up to 1000 buffers on that list so we're looking at
> > potentially O(1000000) operations.
> >
> > Plan B is to stick with a doubly-linked list, but mark the address_space's
> > list_head by setting bit 0 of its list_head.next to 1.
> >
> > The challenge is to implement this in a manner which Linus doesn't notice ;)
> In the mean time I though of an improvement of our cunning plan ;) We
> could reserve a bit in bh_state. Something like BH_Neighbor_EIO. If
> buffer is going to be thrown out from private_list (and has BH_Write_EIO
> or BH_Neighbor_EIO set) we find another victim (previous buffer on the
> list) and mark it by BH_Neighbor_EIO. If the buffer was the first one,
> we can set error on the mapping. By this we get rid of going through the
> long link list.
> I guess I like this solution enough so that I start coding ;).
hm.
Another approach would be to allocate a new buffer_head which "belongs" to
the address_space. So instead of doing:
bh<->bh<->address_space<->bh<->bh
we do:
address_space
^
|
v
bh<->bh<->bh'<->bh<->bh
and set a magic bit in bh' which says "this is not a real bh; your
address_space is at *b_private".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-20 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-11 17:43 [PATCH] Fix ext2 error reporting on fsync Jan Kara
2006-01-12 4:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-12 10:20 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 11:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-12 13:58 ` Chris Mason
2006-01-12 14:21 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 15:36 ` Chris Mason
2006-01-12 16:32 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 14:26 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-12 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-13 2:08 ` Chris Mason
2006-01-13 2:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-18 22:46 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-18 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-19 12:21 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-19 21:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 13:41 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-20 21:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-01-20 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-22 22:55 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-23 0:06 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-22 22:32 ` Jan Kara
2006-01-22 23:31 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060120132402.51ee5151.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).