From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Galibert Subject: Re: max symlink = 5? ?bug? ?feature deficit? Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:10:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20060213141011.GB59213@dspnet.fr.eu.org> References: <43ED5A7B.7040908@tlinx.org> <20060212180601.GU27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> <43EFA63B.30907@tlinx.org> <20060212212504.GX27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> <43EFBCA9.1090501@tlinx.org> <20060213000803.GY27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> <43EFD8BF.1040205@tlinx.org> <20060213073746.GG11380@w.ods.org> <1139816896.2997.19.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060213080331.GH11380@w.ods.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux-Kernel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dspnet.fr.eu.org ([213.186.44.138]:35857 "EHLO dspnet.fr.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751781AbWBMOKM (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:10:12 -0500 To: Willy Tarreau Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060213080331.GH11380@w.ods.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:03:31AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > That's how I understood it, but I only thought about easy cases. Now, > I can imagine cross-FS links and I don't see an easy way to resolve > them :-/ And don't forget automount points too... OG.