From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: sct@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext3 writepage() journal avoidance
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:22:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060309152254.743f4b52.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141929562.21442.4.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I am trying to speed up ext3 writepage() by avoiding
> journaling in non-block allocation cases. Does this
> look reasonable ? So far, my testing is fine. What am
> I missing here ?
Nothing. ext3's writepage(), prepare_write() and commit_write() do often
needlessy open and close transactions when we're doing overwrites. It's
something I've meant to look at for a few years, on and off.
I'd expect that prepare_write() and commit_write() are more important than
writepage().
It might be better to test PageMappedToDisk() rather than walking the
buffers. It's certainly faster and it makes optimisation of
prepare_write() and commit_write() easier to handle.
I'm not sure that PageMappedToDisk() gets set in all the right places
though - it's mainly for the `nobh' handling and block_prepare_write()
would need to be taught to set it. I guess that'd be a net win, even if
only ext3 uses it..
Then again, we might be able to speed up block_prepare_write() if
PageMappedToDisk(page).
If we go this way we need to be very very careful to keep PG_mappedtodisk
coherent with the state of the buffers. Tricky. We need to think about
whether block_truncate_page() should be clearing PG_mappedtoisk if we did a
partial truncate.
Don't forget that ext3 supports journalled-mode files on ordered- or
writeback-mounted filesystems, via `chattr +j'. Please be sure to test the
various combinations which that allows when playing with the write paths -
it can trip things up.
Also be sure to test nobh-mode.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-09 18:39 [RFC PATCH] ext3 writepage() journal avoidance Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-09 23:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-10 0:45 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 1:16 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-10 7:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 8:23 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-10 8:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 8:53 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-10 14:58 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 16:19 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-10 16:40 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 16:51 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-10 17:00 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 16:46 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 13:43 ` Dave Kleikamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060309152254.743f4b52.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=Ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).