linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: sct@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ext3 writepage() journal avoidance
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:22:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060309152254.743f4b52.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141929562.21442.4.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>

Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I am trying to speed up ext3 writepage() by avoiding
> journaling in non-block allocation cases. Does this
> look reasonable ? So far, my testing is fine. What am 
> I missing here ?

Nothing.  ext3's writepage(), prepare_write() and commit_write() do often
needlessy open and close transactions when we're doing overwrites.  It's
something I've meant to look at for a few years, on and off.

I'd expect that prepare_write() and commit_write() are more important than
writepage().

It might be better to test PageMappedToDisk() rather than walking the
buffers.  It's certainly faster and it makes optimisation of
prepare_write() and commit_write() easier to handle.

I'm not sure that PageMappedToDisk() gets set in all the right places
though - it's mainly for the `nobh' handling and block_prepare_write()
would need to be taught to set it.  I guess that'd be a net win, even if
only ext3 uses it..

Then again, we might be able to speed up block_prepare_write() if
PageMappedToDisk(page).

If we go this way we need to be very very careful to keep PG_mappedtodisk
coherent with the state of the buffers.  Tricky.  We need to think about
whether block_truncate_page() should be clearing PG_mappedtoisk if we did a
partial truncate.

Don't forget that ext3 supports journalled-mode files on ordered- or
writeback-mounted filesystems, via `chattr +j'.  Please be sure to test the
various combinations which that allows when playing with the write paths -
it can trip things up.

Also be sure to test nobh-mode.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-09 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-09 18:39 [RFC PATCH] ext3 writepage() journal avoidance Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-09 23:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-03-10  0:45   ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10  1:16     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-10  7:59   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10  8:23     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-10  8:43       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10  8:53         ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-10 14:58           ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 16:19         ` Dave Jones
2006-03-10 16:40           ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 16:51             ` Dave Jones
2006-03-10 17:00               ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 16:46           ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-03-10 13:43       ` Dave Kleikamp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060309152254.743f4b52.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=Ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).