From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Optimized MPEG file system
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:33:08 -0500
Message-ID: <20060316183308.GA18388@hash.localnet>
References: <11424781042886-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <20060316043351.GA5838@cynthia.pants.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.deathmatch.net ([216.200.85.210]:30698 "EHLO
	mail.deathmatch.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964808AbWCPSd1
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:33:27 -0500
To: Brad Boyer <flar@allandria.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060316043351.GA5838@cynthia.pants.nu>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:33:51PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> This sounds a lot like HFS/HFS+. Each file has a fixed number of extents
> in the main catalog record, and extras go into the extents overflow
> tree.  

Yes this sounds basically like the same thing - I'll go take a look at 
the code.

Thanks for the tip!
-Bob