From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Takashi Sato <sho@tnes.nec.co.jp>,
Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:42:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060331064209.GH17364@schatzie.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143746561.3896.35.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Mar 30, 2006 11:22 -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> I made a kernel patch to allow a file to specify which block group it
> wants it's blocks to allocate from(using ioctl to set the goal
> allocation block group). I set the goal block group falls to somewhere
> >8TB, and did dd tests on that file. Verified this with debugfs, the
> allocated block numbers are beyond 2**31.
>
> Also before run fsx tests, created many directories (32768 at most:) and
> verified one directory's inode is located in block group >8TB space. So
> when we do fsx test on files under that directory, we are
> creating/testing files >8TB.
While useful, I don't think it is critical. As you mention, it is possible
to do this by creating a lot of directories, though it might be tedious
(need over 16k directories for a 2TB filesystem, 64k for an 8TB fs).
Also, since this increases the allocation for each inode's reservation from
16 bytes to 20 (really 32 because it is in a slab), it might have a small
performance hit.
If it was available under some sort of compile-time configuration option
it might make sense for developers.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-31 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060325223358sho@rifu.tnes.nec.co.jp>
[not found] ` <1143485147.3970.23.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20060327131049.2c6a5413.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20060327225847.GC3756@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <1143530126.11560.6.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
[not found] ` <1143568905.3935.13.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1143623605.5046.11.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
2006-03-30 1:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-31 22:42 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-02 20:13 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10 9:11 ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10 8:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-13 15:26 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-17 21:07 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 21:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-17 21:32 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-18 7:14 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 7:30 ` [Ext2-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-18 10:57 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 19:08 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-18 14:09 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 21:01 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2006-04-20 11:28 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-20 14:39 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-21 11:17 ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10 16:57 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10 19:06 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-11 7:07 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-14 17:23 ` [Ext2-devel] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-30 17:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:01 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 17:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:16 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 19:22 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-31 6:42 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2006-03-31 13:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-01 6:50 ` Nathan Scott
2006-05-26 5:00 ` [PATCH 0/2]Define ext3 in-kernel filesystem block types and extend " Mingming Cao
2006-05-26 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30 17:55 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2]ext3 block allocation/reservation fixes to support 2**32 block numbers Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2]Other ext3 in-kernel block number type fix " Mingming Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060331064209.GH17364@schatzie.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=Laurent.Vivier@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sho@tnes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).