linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	Takashi Sato <sho@tnes.nec.co.jp>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ext2-devel <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:07:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060417210746.GB3945@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1144941999.2914.1.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:26:39PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le lun 10/04/2006 à 10:24, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Does the attached patch look like the thing you though about ?
> > 
> > I guess so.  But it'll need a lot of performance testing on big SMP
> > to work out what the impact is.
> 
> I made some tests with dbench:
> 
> IBM x440: 8 CPUs hyperthreaded = 16 CPUs (Xeon at 1.4 Ghz)
> 

I ran the same tests on a 16 core EM64T box very similar to the one you ran
dbench on :). Dbench results on ext3 varies quite a bit.  I couldn't get 
to a statistically significant conclusion  For eg,

With atomic counters, 32 clients, 3 runs
Throughput 187.712 MB/sec 32 procs
Throughput 197.059 MB/sec 32 procs
Throughput 203.522 MB/sec 32 procs

Without atomic counters (per-cpu counters), 32 clients, 3 runs
Throughput 228.805 MB/sec 32 procs
Throughput 155.831 MB/sec 32 procs
Throughput 134.777 MB/sec 32 procs

The oprofile profiles for the atomic counter case looks like this:

CPU: P4 / Xeon with 2 hyper-threads, speed 3002.77 MHz (estimated)
Counted GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS events (time during which processor is not
stopped) with a unit mask of 0x01 (mandatory) count 100000
samples  %        app name                 symbol name
180505286 57.7844  vmlinux-t                poll_idle
51944524 16.6288  vmlinux-t                ext3_test_allocatable
43648955 13.9731  vmlinux-t                bitmap_search_next_usable_block
2892251   0.9259  vmlinux-t                copy_user_generic
2099969   0.6723  vmlinux-t                do_get_write_access
1459523   0.4672  vmlinux-t                journal_dirty_metadata
1393413   0.4461  vmlinux-t                journal_stop

So the atomic counters in question are not even hotspots on this workload,
so IMHO, dbench cannot be used to come to any conclusion regarding per-cpu
counters vs atomics here.

Thanks,
Kiran

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-17 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060325223358sho@rifu.tnes.nec.co.jp>
     [not found] ` <1143485147.3970.23.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
     [not found]   ` <20060327131049.2c6a5413.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]     ` <20060327225847.GC3756@localhost.localdomain>
     [not found]       ` <1143530126.11560.6.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
     [not found]         ` <1143568905.3935.13.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
     [not found]           ` <1143623605.5046.11.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
2006-03-30  1:38             ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB Mingming Cao
2006-03-30  1:54               ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-31 22:42                 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-02 20:13                   ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10  9:11                 ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10  8:24                   ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-13 15:26                     ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-17 21:07                       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2006-04-17 21:09                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-17 21:32                           ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-18  7:14                             ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18  7:30                               ` [Ext2-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-18 10:57                                 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 19:08                                   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-18 14:09                                 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 21:01                                 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2006-04-20 11:28                                   ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-20 14:39                                   ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-21 11:17                                     ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10 16:57                   ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10 19:06                     ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-11  7:07                       ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-14 17:23                         ` [Ext2-devel] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-30 17:36               ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:01                 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 17:40               ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:16                 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 19:22                   ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-31  6:42                     ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-31 13:33                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-01  6:50                     ` Nathan Scott
2006-05-26  5:00               ` [PATCH 0/2]Define ext3 in-kernel filesystem block types and extend " Mingming Cao
2006-05-26 18:08                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30 17:55                   ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30  1:39             ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2]ext3 block allocation/reservation fixes to support 2**32 block numbers Mingming Cao
2006-03-30  1:39             ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2]Other ext3 in-kernel block number type fix " Mingming Cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060417210746.GB3945@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=Laurent.Vivier@bull.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sho@tnes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).