From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
Takashi Sato <sho@tnes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:08:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060418190829.GA3905@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1145357820.17767.11.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:57:00PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> I made tests on same system (x440) with postmark-1.51 :
>
> pm> set numbers 100000
> pm> set transactions 250000
> pm> run
>
> With atomic_t:
>
> Time:
> 3761 seconds total
> 2414 seconds of transactions (103 per second)
>
> Files:
> 225064 created (59 per second)
> Creation alone: 100000 files (87 per second)
> Mixed with transactions: 125064 files (51 per second)
> 124961 read (51 per second)
> 124895 appended (51 per second)
> 225064 deleted (59 per second)
> Deletion alone: 100128 files (503 per second)
> Mixed with transactions: 124936 files (51 per second)
>
> Data:
> 731.14 megabytes read (199.07 kilobytes per second)
> 1359.02 megabytes written (370.02 kilobytes per second)
>
> With percpu_counter:
>
> Time:
> 3787 seconds total
> 2422 seconds of transactions (103 per second)
>
> Files:
> 225064 created (59 per second)
> Creation alone: 100000 files (85 per second)
> Mixed with transactions: 125064 files (51 per second)
> 124961 read (51 per second)
> 124895 appended (51 per second)
> 225064 deleted (59 per second)
> Deletion alone: 100128 files (503 per second)
> Mixed with transactions: 124936 files (51 per second)
>
> Data:
> 731.14 megabytes read (197.70 kilobytes per second)
> 1359.02 megabytes written (367.48 kilobytes per second)
Can we get oprofile output for these tests please? It will give us a clue as
to how much of hot spots the ext3 atomic counters are with this benchmark.
Also, it will be nice to have results for 3-5 iterations of the test
to make sure we are looking at statistically significant numbers.
Thanks,
Kiran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-18 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060325223358sho@rifu.tnes.nec.co.jp>
[not found] ` <1143485147.3970.23.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20060327131049.2c6a5413.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20060327225847.GC3756@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <1143530126.11560.6.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
[not found] ` <1143568905.3935.13.camel@dyn9047017067.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1143623605.5046.11.camel@openx2.frec.bull.fr>
2006-03-30 1:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2]Extend ext3 filesystem limit from 8TB to 16TB Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-31 22:42 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-02 20:13 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10 9:11 ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10 8:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-13 15:26 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-17 21:07 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-17 21:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-17 21:32 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-04-18 7:14 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 7:30 ` [Ext2-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-18 10:57 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 19:08 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2006-04-18 14:09 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-18 21:01 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2006-04-20 11:28 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-20 14:39 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-21 11:17 ` [Ext2-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2006-04-10 16:57 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-10 19:06 ` Mingming Cao
2006-04-11 7:07 ` Laurent Vivier
2006-04-14 17:23 ` [Ext2-devel] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2006-03-30 17:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:01 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 17:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-30 19:16 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 19:22 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-31 6:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-03-31 13:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-01 6:50 ` Nathan Scott
2006-05-26 5:00 ` [PATCH 0/2]Define ext3 in-kernel filesystem block types and extend " Mingming Cao
2006-05-26 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-30 17:55 ` Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2]ext3 block allocation/reservation fixes to support 2**32 block numbers Mingming Cao
2006-03-30 1:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2]Other ext3 in-kernel block number type fix " Mingming Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060418190829.GA3905@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=Laurent.Vivier@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sho@tnes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).