From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH,RESEND] make knfsd interact cleanly with HSMs
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 07:42:55 +0100
Message-ID: <20060508064255.GA8614@infradead.org>
References: <20060505115254.GA13916@sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Filesystem Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:6048 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932340AbWEHGnK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 May 2006 02:43:10 -0400
To: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060505115254.GA13916@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

NACK.  As long as we have no HSM support in the tree there's no reason to
add this.  From the kernel's point it's just untested and unused code that
can break.