From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:49:59 -0400 Message-ID: <20060609194959.GC10524@thunk.org> References: <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <448997FA.50109@garzik.org> <44899A1C.7000207@garzik.org> <4489B83E.9090104@sbcglobal.net> <20060609181426.GC5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <4489C34B.1080806@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthew Frost , Alex Tomas , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:27822 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030219AbWFITuV (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:50:21 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4489C34B.1080806@garzik.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:51:55PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > ext3 is already essentially xiafs-on-life-support, when you consider > today's large storage systems and today's filesystem technology. Just > look at the ugly hacks needed to support expanding an ext3 filesystem > online. And what ugly hacks are you talking about? It's actually quite clean; with the latest e2fsprogs, you use the same command (resize2fs) for doing both online and offline resizing. - Ted