From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sonny Rao Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:42:00 -0400 Message-ID: <20060609214200.GA18213@kevlar.burdell.org> References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060609091327.GA3679@infradead.org> <20060609030759.48cd17a0.akpm@osdl.org> <44899653.1020007@garzik.org> <20060609095620.22326f9d.akpm@osdl.org> <4489AAD9.80806@garzik.org> <20060609103543.52c00c62.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , hch@infradead.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from kevlar.burdell.org ([66.92.73.214]:14060 "EHLO kevlar.burdell.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030525AbWFIVmD (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:42:03 -0400 To: Andrew Morton Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060609103543.52c00c62.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:35:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > All that being said, Linux's filesystems are looking increasingly crufty > and we are getting to the time where we would benefit from a greenfield > start-a-new-one. I'm curious about this comment; in what way are they _collectively_ looking crufty ?