From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:07:34 +0200
Message-ID: <20060610000734.GA56336@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com>
	<4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org>
	<20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int>
	<44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606090836160.5498@g5.osdl.org>
	<m33beecntr.fsf@bzzz.home.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606090913390.5498@g5.osdl.org>
	<m3k67qb7hr.fsf@bzzz.home.net> <4489A7ED.8070007@garzik.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	ext2-devel <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Return-path: <ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4489A7ED.8070007@garzik.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel>,
	<mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=ext2-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel>,
	<mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:55:09PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Alex Tomas wrote:
> >so, instead of taking one (quite-well-tested) part that solves one of
> >the biggest ext3 limitation, you propose to start a new project and
> >get something in a year (probably) ?
> >
> >I think about extents as a step-by-step way ...
> 
> That is what the entirety of Linux development is -- step-by-step.
> 
> It is OBVIOUS that it would take five minutes to start ext4.
> 
> 1) clone a new tree
> 2) cp -a fs/ext3 fs/ext4
> 3) apply extent and 48bit patches
> 4) apply related e2fsprogs patches

5) force all options (attributes, etc) on and remove the flags
   indicating their existence from the metadata, you'll need the space
   for the fs evolution.

6) change the fs just enough so that an ext4 fs can never be mounted
   as ext3 or 2.

  OG.