From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Dushistov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5]: ufs: missed brelse and wrong baseblk Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:47:21 +0400 Message-ID: <20060619064721.GA6106@rain.homenetwork> References: <20060617101403.GA22098@rain.homenetwork> <20060618162054.GW27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20060618175045.GX27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.ru ([194.67.23.122]:12559 "EHLO mx2.mail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751006AbWFSGl5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 02:41:57 -0400 To: Al Viro Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060618175045.GX27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:50:45PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > * block may be bigger than page. That can cause all sorts of fun > problems in interaction with our VM, since allocation can affect more than > one page and that has to be taken into account. In fact this is not a problem. Blocks in terms of linux VFS is fragments in terms of UFS. And if fragment >4096 we just don't mount such file system. So we can easily support 32K blocks. -- /Evgeniy