From: Tomas Hruby <thruby@few.vu.nl>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Erik Mouw <erik@harddisk-recovery.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext2/3 subdirectory limit [WAS: Choosing and tuning Linux file systems]
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:03:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060626210357.GA4308@fspc268> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060626173556.GA19815@tuatara.stupidest.org>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:35:56AM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:54:35AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> > I've heard reports of programs that attempt to optimize recursive
> > descents by counting the number of directories found so far and
> > comparing it with st_nlinks.
>
> Some versions of find do this. Breaking these semantics I think would
> be painful for some people.
So if I have a directory where the nlink does not correspond with then number
of subdirectories, the applications you mentined don't work correctly?
As Ted said, not all fiel systems follow this. This means that such applications
cannot e.g., remove a directory (rm -r) from such a FS? I am asking because we
have an issue that an older version of mc cannot remove directory recursively,
however we have not observed this on any new system. Might the nlink count be
the problem?
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-26 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-25 22:00 Choosing and tuning Linux file systems Valerie Henson
2006-06-25 22:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-06-25 22:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-26 7:22 ` Neil Brown
2006-06-26 9:04 ` Nate Diller
2006-06-27 18:46 ` Valerie Henson
2006-06-26 11:10 ` Erik Mouw
2006-06-26 12:36 ` ext2/3 subdirectory limit [WAS: Choosing and tuning Linux file systems] Tomas Hruby
2006-06-26 12:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-26 12:54 ` Theodore Tso
2006-06-26 16:25 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-06-26 17:35 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-06-26 21:03 ` Tomas Hruby [this message]
2006-06-26 21:03 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-06-26 21:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-06-26 12:59 ` Erik Mouw
2006-06-26 21:09 ` Tomas Hruby
[not found] ` <20060626091357.GQ5817@schatzie.adilger.int>
2006-06-26 22:01 ` Choosing and tuning Linux file systems Valerie Henson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060626210357.GA4308@fspc268 \
--to=thruby@few.vu.nl \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=erik@harddisk-recovery.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox