linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu,
	tigran@veritas.com
Subject: Re: O_CAREFUL flag to disable open() side effects
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:43:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060727174307.GC5178@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44C8F8E3.1070306@zytor.com>

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:33:23AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Dumb thought: would it make sense to add an O_CAREFUL flag to open(), to 
> disable side effects?  It seems that a number of devices have this issue 
> and one have to jump through weird hoops to configure them.  Obviously, 
> a file descriptor obtained with O_CAREFUL may not be fully functional, 
> at the device driver's option.
> 
> For a conventional file, directory, or block device O_CAREFUL is a 
> no-op.

What about door locking on block devices?  That might be an undesirable
side effect in some circumstances, so you might not want it to be a no-op
on blockdevs.

> For ttys it would typically behave similar to O_NONBLOCK 
> followed immediately by a fcntl to clear the nonblock flag.

What about, eg, raising DTR and RTS ?  You'd want to avoid raising
those if you're not actually going to be using the port.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core

  reply	other threads:[~2006-07-27 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-27 14:25 [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2 Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-27 15:07 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-27 15:33   ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-27 16:09     ` Alan Cox
2006-07-27 16:01       ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-27 16:30         ` Alan Cox
2006-07-27 17:07           ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-27 18:27           ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-27 16:41 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-07-27 17:05   ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-27 17:13     ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-07-27 17:33       ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-27 17:44         ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-07-27 18:00           ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-27 17:33     ` Alan Cox
2006-07-27 17:33       ` O_CAREFUL flag to disable open() side effects H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-27 17:43         ` Russell King [this message]
2006-07-27 17:50         ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-07-27 18:05         ` Alan Cox
2006-07-27 18:03           ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-05 21:05       ` [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2 Pavel Machek
2006-07-27 18:06 ` Petr Baudis
2006-07-27 18:10   ` Pekka Enberg
2006-07-27 19:30     ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-07-28  3:40       ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-07-27 18:34   ` Alan Cox
2006-08-05 12:29 ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-07  5:42   ` Pekka J Enberg
2006-08-07  8:17   ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-07  9:51     ` Pekka Enberg
2006-08-07 20:41       ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-07 22:24         ` Chase Venters
2006-08-08 12:15           ` Alan Cox
2006-08-09  8:41             ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-09 10:39               ` Alan Cox
2006-08-09 18:00                 ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-09 18:36                   ` Alan Cox
2006-08-09 19:13                     ` Pekka Enberg
2006-08-09 20:08                       ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-09 21:29                       ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-11  7:52                   ` Helge Hafting
2006-08-08 12:29         ` Alan Cox
2006-08-08 12:31           ` Pekka Enberg
2006-08-08 12:57           ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-08 14:14             ` Alan Cox
2006-08-08 13:57               ` Pavel Machek
2006-08-09  8:41           ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-09 10:42             ` Alan Cox
2006-08-09 18:00               ` Edgar Toernig
2006-08-09 18:35                 ` Alan Cox
2006-08-09 19:14                   ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060727174307.GC5178@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=drepper@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI \
    --cc=tigran@veritas.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).