From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #11] Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:05:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20060728230540.7358b435.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060727205222.8443.29381.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, steved@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060727205222.8443.29381.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:52:22 +0100 David Howells wrote: > These patches make it possible to share NFS superblocks between related > mounts, where "related" means on the same server and FSID. Inodes and dentries > will be shared where the NFS filehandles are the same (for example if two NFS3 > files come from the same export but from different mounts, such as is not > uncommon with autofs on /home). It's not clear why these were sent. The first 25 patches are, as far as I can tell, already in Trond's tree. Whether Trond has the correct versions of these is now anybody's guess... "[PATCH 26/30] NFS: Use local caching" appears to be the first patch which isn't in Trond's tree, but it doesn't work due to significant changes in nfs_clear_inode().