linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ufs: ufs_change_blocknr: skip truncated pages
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:00:20 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060801120020.GA24263@rain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060801003958.c628455f.akpm@osdl.org>

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 12:39:58AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm not sure that the `goto repeat' is needed if truncate got there first,
> really - if truncate took the page down then it's now outside i_size and
> shouldn't be coming back.
> 
> If the page _can_ come back then this code is all rather problematic. 
> Because this means that the page can come back (via an extending write())
> one nanosecond after ufs_get_locked_page() returns NULL.  Won't the callers
> of ufs_get_locked_page() get confused by that?

ufs_get_locked_page is called twice in ufs code, 
one time in ufs_truncate path(we allocated last block), 
and another time when fragments are reallocated.
In ideal world in the second case on allocation/free block layer we
should not know that things like `truncate' exists, but now with
such crutch like ufs_get_locked_page we can (or should?) skip truncated pages.

Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>

---

Index: linux-2.6.18-rc2-mm1/fs/ufs/balloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc2-mm1.orig/fs/ufs/balloc.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc2-mm1/fs/ufs/balloc.c
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void ufs_change_blocknr(struct in
 
 		if (likely(cur_index != index)) {
 			page = ufs_get_locked_page(mapping, index);
-			if (IS_ERR(page))
+			if (!page || IS_ERR(page)) /* it was truncated or EIO */
 				continue;
 		} else
 			page = locked_page;
Index: linux-2.6.18-rc2-mm1/fs/ufs/util.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.18-rc2-mm1.orig/fs/ufs/util.c
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc2-mm1/fs/ufs/util.c
@@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ struct page *ufs_get_locked_page(struct 
 {
 	struct page *page;
 
-try_again:
 	page = find_lock_page(mapping, index);
 	if (!page) {
 		page = read_cache_page(mapping, index,
@@ -271,7 +270,8 @@ try_again:
 			/* Truncate got there first */
 			unlock_page(page);
 			page_cache_release(page);
-			goto try_again;
+			page = NULL;
+			goto out;
 		}
 
 		if (!PageUptodate(page) || PageError(page)) {

-- 
/Evgeniy


      reply	other threads:[~2006-08-01 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-31 12:57 [PATCH]: ufs: ufs_get_locked_patch race fix Evgeniy Dushistov
2006-08-01  6:02 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-01  7:18   ` Nick Piggin
2006-08-01  7:30   ` Evgeniy Dushistov
2006-08-01  7:39     ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-01 12:00       ` Evgeniy Dushistov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060801120020.GA24263@rain \
    --to=dushistov@mail.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).