From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:48:08 -0600 Message-ID: <20060803144808.GA4379@parisc-linux.org> References: <20060803063622.GB8631@goober> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Akkana Peck , Mark Fasheh , Jesse Barnes , Arjan van de Ven , Chris Wedgwood , jsipek@cs.sunysb.edu, Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:41674 "EHLO palinux.external.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932473AbWHCOsK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:48:10 -0400 To: Valerie Henson Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060803063622.GB8631@goober> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:36:22PM -0700, Valerie Henson wrote: > (Corrected Chris Wedgwood's name and email.) > > My friend Akkana followed my advice to use noatime on one of her > machines, but discovered that mutt was unusable because it always > thought that new messages had arrived since the last time it had > checked a folder (mbox format). I thought this was a bummer, so I This is why people normally recommend "nodiratime" ...