From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Valerie Henson <val_henson@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Akkana Peck <akkana@shallowsky.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
jsipek@cs.sunysb.edu, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 11:36:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060805183609.GA7564@tuatara.stupidest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1154797475.3054.79.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:04:34PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> the vfs shouldn't consider it clean, it should consider it
> "atime-only dirty".. with that many of the vfs interaction issues
> ought to go away
should it be atime-dirty or non-critical-dirty? (ie. make it more
generic to cover cases where we might have other non-critical fields
to flush if we can but can tolerate loss if we dont)
adminitedly atime is the only one i can think of now
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-05 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-03 6:36 [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime Valerie Henson
2006-08-03 14:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-08-05 12:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-08-05 13:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-09 14:03 ` Valerie Henson
2006-08-09 15:49 ` Erez Zadok
2006-08-10 12:27 ` Helge Hafting
2006-08-05 16:58 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-08-05 17:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-05 18:36 ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2006-08-05 22:22 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-08-05 23:06 ` David Lang
2006-08-05 23:28 ` dean gaudet
2006-08-06 0:11 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-08-06 3:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-08-09 6:39 ` Valerie Henson
2006-08-09 12:21 ` Jörn Engel
2006-08-09 12:58 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-08-10 11:34 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2006-08-10 17:28 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-08-06 0:13 ` Mark Fasheh
[not found] <6Gts4-6UM-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6GxFs-4Tg-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6Gy8r-5Oh-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6Gze7-7oP-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6GCOJ-4fv-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6GDB1-5qX-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6GDKT-5Eb-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6GHbD-2hm-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6HQ3c-6Pf-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6HVml-6DI-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <6Ih3l-5FP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-08-10 13:07 ` Bodo Eggert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-03 6:29 Valerie Henson
2006-08-03 6:44 ` Josef Sipek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060805183609.GA7564@tuatara.stupidest.org \
--to=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=akkana@shallowsky.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=jsipek@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=shaggy@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=val_henson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).