From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 21:01:47 -0600 Message-ID: <20060806030147.GG4379@parisc-linux.org> References: <20060803063622.GB8631@goober> <20060805122537.GA23239@lst.de> <1154797123.12108.6.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com> <1154797475.3054.79.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060805183609.GA7564@tuatara.stupidest.org> <20060805222247.GQ29686@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Lang , Mark Fasheh , Chris Wedgwood , Arjan van de Ven , Dave Kleikamp , Christoph Hellwig , Valerie Henson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Akkana Peck , Jesse Barnes , jsipek@cs.sunysb.edu, Al Viro Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:64714 "EHLO palinux.external.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751500AbWHFDBt (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Aug 2006 23:01:49 -0400 To: dean gaudet Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 04:28:29PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote: > you can work around mutt's silly dependancy on atime by configuring it > with --enable-buffy-size. so far mutt is the only program i've discovered > which cares about atime. For the shell, atime is the difference between 'you have mail' and 'you have new mail'. I still don't understand though, how much does this really buy us over nodiratime?