From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Subject: Re: BUGs in mm/rmap.c
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:42:25 -0600
Message-ID: <20060817194225.GO4340@parisc-linux.org>
References: <20060817021008.GD20340@fspc268> <20060817113826.GL4340@parisc-linux.org> <20060817191932.GA10046@fspc268>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:12979 "EHLO
	palinux.external.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751267AbWHQTm0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:42:26 -0400
To: Tomas Hruby <thruby@gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060817191932.GA10046@fspc268>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:19:32PM +0200, Tomas Hruby wrote:
> I tried that today again and it crashed with a different error on both
> kernels, with and without that patch. Here are the logs :

Could you run memtest86 on this machine?  The errors seem to be memory
corruption, and it's useful to rule out faulty ram before we start
chasing bugs.