From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] BLOCK: Separate the bounce buffering code from the highmem code [try #2]
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:12:26 +0100
Message-ID: <20060825141226.GE10659@infradead.org>
References: <20060824213252.21323.18226.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060824213300.21323.67601.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:11722 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751211AbWHYOMr (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:12:47 -0400
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060824213300.21323.67601.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/mm/bounce.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,302 @@
> +/* bounce.c: bounce buffer handling for block devices
> + *
> + * - Split from highmem.c
> + */

please don't mention the filename in the top of file comment, it's redundant
and get out of sync too easily on renames.  Otherwise the patch looks good.